Recent reports indicate that the Trump administration is exploring a plan to permanently relocate up to one million Palestinians from the Gaza Strip to Libya.

This proposal has sparked significant attention due to its scale, geopolitical implications, and potential humanitarian concerns.

This report synthesizes information from credible news sources to outline the details of the plan, its context, and the reactions it has elicited.

According to NBC News, the Trump administration is actively working on a proposal to relocate as many as one million Palestinians from Gaza to Libya. The plan, described as being under serious consideration, involves discussions with Libyan leadership.

While specific details remain unclear, the administration is reportedly contemplating offering Libya billions of dollars in previously frozen funds as an incentive for accepting the Palestinian population.

No final agreement has been reached, and the logistics of such a massive resettlement effort are murky, with significant financial and practical challenges anticipated.

Reuters, citing NBC News, corroborates that the plan is being discussed with Libyan authorities, noting that Israel has been informed of these talks.

The proposal appears to be part of broader diplomatic negotiations, though the exact mechanisms for implementation, including who would be relocated and where they would be settled in Libya, remain unspecified.

Libya’s ongoing instability, marked by a division between rival factions since 2014, raises concerns about its capacity to absorb such a large number of people.

The U.S. State Department has previously criticized Libya for its “harsh and life-threatening prison conditions” and advises against travel due to crime, civil unrest, and armed conflict.

Human rights groups have described conditions in Libya’s migrant detention centers as “horrific” and “deplorable,” highlighting the risks of relocating vulnerable populations to such an environment.

The plan aligns with the Trump administration’s broader immigration and foreign policy strategies, which include aggressive deportation efforts and negotiations with third countries to accept migrants.

For instance, the administration has explored deporting migrants to Libya, Rwanda, and other nations, often facing legal and ethical challenges.

A federal judge recently ruled that deporting non-Libyan immigrants to Libya without proper screenings for persecution or torture violates existing court orders, indicating potential legal hurdles for the Palestinian relocation plan.

The proposal has drawn significant attention on social media platforms like X, where posts reflect a mix of concern and skepticism.

Multiple users, including @disclosetv, @visegrad24, and @NewsWire_US, have shared NBC’s report, emphasizing the plan’s ambition to “permanently relocate” up to one million Palestinians.

These posts underscore the controversial nature of the proposal, though they do not provide additional details beyond the initial reporting.

Human rights advocates and international observers have expressed alarm.

The reported conditions in Libya, coupled with its history of mistreating migrants, suggest that relocating Palestinians there could expose them to significant risks.

Luca Casarini of the NGO Mediterranea Saving Humans described the move as an “endorsement of the horror” characteristic of the Trump administration’s policies.

Libyan authorities have also reacted negatively to related deportation proposals.

Both the western and eastern factions of Libya’s government have reportedly rejected plans to accept U.S. deportees, with Khalifa Haftar’s Libyan National Army explicitly stating that migrants would not be received through its controlled airports and ports.

This opposition could complicate negotiations for the Palestinian relocation plan.