(OPINION) The concept of transhumanism, often described as the fusion of humanity with advanced technology, has sparked intense debate across political, ethical, and spiritual spheres.

Some view it as a path to human enhancement, while others, as articulated in a recent CBN News report, label it a “digital abomination” tied to a globalist agenda.

Transhumanism advocates for the use of technology to transcend human limitations, envisioning a future where artificial intelligence (AI), bioengineering, and neural interfaces could enhance cognition, longevity, and physical capabilities.

According to a CBN News segment featuring the author of Dark Aeon, transhumanism is described as “the great merger of humankind with the Machine,” with billions already engaging through smartphones as a precursor to deeper integration.

The report suggests that technologies like brain-implanted microchips could redefine humanity, raising questions about autonomy and identity.

The Guardian has also explored transhumanism, noting its appeal among tech elites who see it as a means to achieve “technological salvation.”

However, the outlet highlights skepticism from critics who argue that such visions often ignore socioeconomic disparities, potentially creating a divide where only the wealthy benefit from enhancements.

The framing of transhumanism as a “new AI religion” stems from its quasi-spiritual undertones, where technology is positioned as a savior. CBN News cites the Dark Aeon author, who, with a background in science and theology, warns of “good people constructing a digital abomination” under the guise of progress.

This perspective suggests that transhumanism could supplant traditional religious values with a technocentric worldview, prioritizing machine intelligence over human essence.

In contrast, a Reuters analysis of AI’s societal impact acknowledges the fervor surrounding technological advancement but avoids religious framing.

It discusses how AI’s rapid development fuels both optimism and fear, with some experts cautioning against unchecked integration into human life.

Reuters emphasizes regulatory challenges rather than spiritual concerns, indicating a more secular critique of transhumanist ideals.

The notion of a “globalist agenda” tied to transhumanism often appears in conservative media.

Fox News has reported on concerns that global institutions and tech giants could leverage AI and transhumanist technologies to exert control over populations, citing digital identity systems and programmable currencies as potential tools.

These fears align with posts found on X, where users like @LeeWinchester20 warn of a dystopian future involving “6G, Internet of Bodies,” and “human augmentation” sold as transhumanism.

However, mainstream outlets like The New York Times and The Washington Post offer a more nuanced view.

The Times has covered transhumanism in the context of bioethics, focusing on the risks of unregulated neural implants and AI-driven enhancements.

It argues that the real danger lies not in a coordinated globalist plot but in the lack of oversight, which could lead to privacy violations or unintended consequences.

The Post similarly emphasizes the need for ethical frameworks, citing experts who worry about AI exacerbating inequality rather than fulfilling conspiratorial narratives.