(OPINION) In recent days, former Fox News host and current podcast personality Megyn Kelly has made headlines by publicly linking a newly diagnosed autoimmune condition to the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine.
Her statements, shared during an episode of her SiriusXM show, The Megyn Kelly Show, have sparked widespread discussion across social media and news outlets.
Kelly’s claims come as vaccine-related debates continue to polarize public opinion. Multiple major publications have covered her story, each offering its own perspective on her revelations.
According to the New York Post, Kelly disclosed that she developed an autoimmune issue following her vaccination, expressing regret over her decision to get the shot.
“I wish I hadn’t done it,” she said, detailing how a routine annual checkup revealed “something wrong” with her bloodwork, prompting further medical investigation.
The Post reported that Kelly’s doctor was “horrified” upon reviewing her results, which eventually led to the diagnosis of an unspecified autoimmune condition.
Kelly tied the onset of this illness to receiving the Pfizer vaccine and a subsequent booster, a claim she made without hesitation on her program.
The Daily Mail echoed this narrative, emphasizing the emotional weight of Kelly’s revelation.
The outlet noted that she described her condition as a “devastating” vaccine injury, one that has left her grappling with both health challenges and regret.
The Daily Mail also highlighted Kelly’s assertion that her doctor found the situation alarming, reinforcing the severity of her claims.
While the specific autoimmune disorder was not named in the reporting, the article underscored Kelly’s insistence on a causal link to the vaccine, a stance that has fueled both support and skepticism online.
Adding further detail, The U.S. Sun covered Kelly’s story by focusing on her public regret and the timeline of events.
The publication reported that Kelly initially got vaccinated to reassure her audience during her tenure as a prominent media figure, only to later question that choice after her diagnosis.
“I regret getting the vaccine,” she reiterated, per The U.S. Sun, pointing to her health decline as evidence of an adverse reaction.
The article also noted her mention of VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) data, which she cited to suggest a broader pattern of vaccine-related issues—though experts have long cautioned that VAERS reports are unverified and do not inherently prove causation.
Kelly’s claims have not gone unchallenged. While outlets like the New York Post, Daily Mail, and The U.S. Sun have amplified her story, the scientific community remains cautious.
Health experts, as referenced in broader vaccine-related coverage, stress that autoimmune conditions can arise from a variety of triggers—genetics, environmental factors, or infections—and that establishing a direct link to vaccines requires rigorous study beyond anecdotal accounts.
No peer-reviewed research specifically corroborating Kelly’s experience was cited in these reports, leaving her assertions as a personal narrative rather than a scientifically validated conclusion.
The coverage of Kelly’s diagnosis reflects her continued influence as a media figure and the ongoing tension surrounding vaccine safety discussions.
Posts on X have mirrored this divide, with some users praising her for speaking out and others questioning the lack of concrete evidence tying her condition to the vaccine.
As trending sentiment on X suggests, her story has reignited debates about transparency, personal choice, and the long-term effects of COVID-19 vaccines.
For now, Megyn Kelly’s claims remain a high-profile anecdote in a larger conversation—one that news outlets have seized upon to highlight both her personal struggle and the broader cultural fault lines it exposes.
Whether her diagnosis will prompt further investigation or remain a footnote in the vaccine debate is unclear, but her willingness to tie it to the Pfizer shot has ensured it won’t fade from public view anytime soon.
