Apple Inc. is currently facing allegations in a lawsuit regarding potential health risks posed to users due to the presence of high levels of toxic substances known as ‘forever chemicals’ in its Watch bands.
These substances, classified as perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), are commonly utilized in the manufacturing of a wide range of products, including textiles, nonstick cookware, and cosmetic items.
PFAS are known for their persistence in the human body and the environment, which has earned them the moniker ‘forever chemicals.’
Research has demonstrated a correlation between these substances and various health issues, including birth defects, an increased incidence of prostate, kidney, and testicular cancers, as well as fertility complications.
The lawsuit references a recent study that examined 22 watch bands purchased from different brands within the United States, revealing that 15 of these bands contained PFAS chemicals, some of which were produced by Apple and Apple Watch Nike.
Apple maintains that its watch bands are constructed from fluoroelastomer, a synthetic rubber that contains fluorine.
However, the lawsuit contends that the company improperly concealed the fact that this synthetic material contains PFAS.
The legal action, filed in the Northern District of California, specifically alleges that the Sport Band, the Ocean Band, and the Nike Sport Band included with Nike-branded Apple Watches possess elevated levels of PFAS.
In response to these allegations, Apple asserted in a statement to DailyMail.com that their Watch bands are safe for consumer use.
The company emphasized its commitment to rigorous testing and analysis of materials utilized in its products, including collaborations with independent laboratories to ensure safety standards are met.
‘[Apple] could have avoided the unreasonable safety and environmental hazard with available manufacturing alternatives, and its failure to do so while continuing to promise consumers health, wellness, and sustainability is unlawful, unfair, and fraudulent under consumer protection laws,’ it continues.
The plaintiffs also allege that Apple’s actions violate California’s unfair competition, advertising and consumer legal remedy laws, and accuse the company of fraud, fraudulent inducement, concealment, misrepresentation, negligence and unjust enrichment.
The lawsuit seeks class certification, which is like a mini-trial in which the allegations are examined and argued by each side’s attorneys.
