A professor at Purdue University argued that images of aborted babies constitute “child pornography” in a recent debate over abortion rights. Professor David Sanders, an associate professor of Biology at Purdue University, accused pro-lifers who use images of aborted fetuses of participating in “child pornography” activities. In what was likely an ill-conceived
attempt to call pro-lifers hypocrites, Sanders argued that the public display of dead fetuses is akin to child pornography. His reason? No one obtained the permission of the fetus “He thinks fetuses are children, and he belongs to an organization that likes to show images of fetuses,” Sanders remarked. “What would you call the public display of a butt naked body of a child?” Sanders asked. “I would call it child pornography. Do they have their permission? Do they have the permission of the fetus? Obviously not.” READ MORE
Again , educated to the point of idiocy
Well professor… Do you have the right to take its life?? You should ask for its permission, they may tell you they want a chance at life, but you know, you didn’t ask!!… Give me a break!! These people!!!
We are to expose all darkness!!! YES!!!! Go ahead – expose the brutality of abortion for what it is= MURDER!!!! I agree with Jen: Who asked the babies’ permission to take their lives????? What about this point in question??? Why would the professor care about child porn if he condones murder??? There is no greater or lesser evil – ALL SIN IS EVIL!!!!!
Haha, well if this isn’t hypocrisy at its finest… So now it’s a baby huh? Sure it’s not just a “lump of tissue,” or a “group of cells,” “just a fetus??” Lol so funny how they kick and choose when they want to admit it’s a baby they’re killing.
Haha, well if this isn’t hypocrisy at its finest… So now it’s a baby huh? Sure it’s not just a “lump of tissue,” or a “group of cells,” “just a fetus??” Lol so funny how they kick and choose when they want to admit it’s a baby they’re killing.
Pick*