President Donald Trump is reportedly preparing to issue an executive order to dismantle the U.S. Department of Education.
According to a report from The Wall Street Journal published on March 5, 2025, a draft of this executive order has been reviewed.
It reveals plans to direct Education Secretary Linda McMahon to “take all necessary steps to facilitate the closure of the Education Department” to the “maximum extent appropriate and permitted by law.”
This development aligns with Trump’s long-standing goal of reducing federal oversight in education and shifting control back to the states—a promise that resonated with many of his supporters during his campaign.
The Wall Street Journal article, authored by reporters briefed on the matter, indicates that the executive order could be signed as early as Thursday, March 6, 2025, which coincides with today’s date.
The draft outlines a strategy to wind down the department’s operations and reassign its responsibilities to other federal agencies. The goal is to streamline government functions while empowering states and parents to take the lead in educational policy.
While the full details of the draft remain under wraps, the intent is clear: to significantly reduce, if not entirely eliminate, the federal footprint in education.
This news has already ignited reactions across various platforms.
Reuters, in a report published at 03:08 PST on March 6, 2025, corroborated the Wall Street Journal’s findings, noting that Trump’s push to abolish the Department of Education has been a consistent objective throughout his political tenure.
The outlet emphasized the historical context, pointing out that this move fulfills a pledge Trump has championed for years, appealing to those who view the department as an example of federal overreach.
The proposal isn’t without precedent in Trump’s administration.
Posts on X from as early as February 6, 2025, highlighted comments from Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, who confirmed Trump’s intent to “reduce the size of the Department of Education, if not abolish it completely.”
These remarks, shared by users like @GuntherEagleman, suggest that the groundwork for this executive action has been in motion for weeks, if not longer.
Supporters of the plan argue that it represents a significant step toward decentralizing education and curbing bureaucratic excess.
On X, user @AshleyWeis4 posted multiple updates on March 5, 2025, framing the draft order as a “bold move to shrink federal bureaucracy and shift education control to states,” fulfilling a key campaign promise.
Her posts, which garnered attention throughout the evening, praised the reassignment of duties to other agencies as a way to prioritize local decision-making over Washington’s influence.
However, the proposal has also drawn skepticism and concern.
Critics question the feasibility of dismantling a department established in 1979, which oversees federal funding, student loans, and educational standards across the country.
Some X users, such as @suzannede4, expressed frustration with a mix of exasperation and disbelief, posting a link to the Wall Street Journal article with facepalm and eye-roll emojis on March 5, 2025, at 22:51 PST.
Others worry about the potential disruption to programs like Title I funding for low-income schools or support for students with disabilities.
While the executive order’s draft signals intent, its implementation remains uncertain. Legal and logistical hurdles could complicate the closure process, as the Department of Education’s functions are deeply embedded in federal law.
Any attempt to fully eliminate it would likely require congressional approval—a challenge given the divided political landscape.
For now, the directive to Secretary McMahon appears to focus on what can be achieved within the executive branch’s authority, leaving the door open for further debate.
As this story unfolds, it’s clear that Trump’s draft executive order has reignited a polarizing conversation about the federal government’s role in education.
Whether it marks the beginning of a transformative shift or a symbolic gesture constrained by practical realities, the coming days will likely reveal the true scope of this ambitious plan.
For now, the nation watches—and debates—as the administration takes its first steps toward a potential educational overhaul.
